Wednesday, October 9, 2019
The printmaking world, according to my lights, is a world where prints are
the highest form of intelligence. I learned about such things from a friend of
mine, Carl Chew, whose Stamp World was one where artistamps are the highest form
of intelligence.
The distribution of 240 Halfwood Presses worldwide.
Many people think that prints belong in the art world, where artworks are
the highest form of intelligence. The fact is, artworks in and of themselves have
no intelligence at all, let alone high – or low, for that matter. To exist at
all, artworks must be given print forms.
The difference between art and prints is negotiation. Prints are
negotiable, whereas artworks are not – not without the introduction of prints.
For an artwork to be negotiated – that is, transferred from one entity to
another – requires mediation.
Generally, art cannot be experienced without mediation – a photograph or digital
image, for example – which are prints. I would include plane tickets or museum
admission tickets. Such prints – both physical and/or digital – mediate between
the art and he or she who experiences it. Print includes text, such as
descriptors, textbooks and magazine articles.
Prints that are considered fine art migrate easily into and out of the
digital media. Prints are experienced as hanging on walls or in folios. As most
prints are on paper, they are highly portable, being mostly of small scale.
This is negotiability – the ability to be transferred and exchanged.
Paintings, on the other hand, are less so. That’s why painters make prints –
the costs to the buyer being less and the prints themselves more readily
shipped to multiple destinations.
The negotiability doesn’t end there because a number of people can
experience and own a print from a publication – each print like every other
print but varying inasmuch they were printed in succession. Two things are
notable about this – one is that they may vary and, two, an invisible link is
made among people who have examples of the print.
Stephen Hazel, a twentieth century artist, wrote a paper titled, “The Print
is in 4-Space” in which he described this phenomenon as a kind of community-building.
However, he didn’t develop this observation – it remained for me to extend into
the digital age. He died before he could participate fully in the print as part
of the Internet, the so-called IoT,
the Internet of Things, defined by
Wikipedia as:
“A system of interrelated computing devices,
mechanical and digital machines, objects, animals or people that are provided
with unique identifiers and the ability to transfer data over a network without
requiring human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction.”
How is this of value to people who need and want prints to be part of both
the print world and the art world? The answer lies in economics – the negotiability
of prints not only in the sharing of cost-free exchange, such as on an artist’s
website where people can experience the visual character of the print, but two
economic worlds: experience and creative.
The experience economy is in the replacement of physical objects for sale
to the experience around objects. For example, the business models of Build-A-Bear
or eating in a restaurant that’s supposed to be in a jungle setting.
The creative economy is business models that rely on artists of all stripes
to attract commerce – such as a city boasting of an art district, or a neighborhood
that erects an unusual playground to attract visitors.
The print world offers both experience and creativity, making it a world
where one’s intellect is stimulated and rewarded easily as well as offering a
potential for development of experiences and creativity.
The global map above is my example. It shows locations of owners of etching
presses I designed and helped build and sell – the presses themselves capable
of making prints for the printmaking world. The owners of the presses are “linked”
in the sense that Stephen Hazel postulated and, furthermore, are potential
instruments of further extending the scope of the printmaking world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment