Thursday, January 30, 2020


ri200120 Emeralda SDG style: One of the many games for the gifts of life  

Other lands for playing 

After a day when I was designing a spinner and game board inspired by my friend Mavis Nduchwa in faraway Botswana, I wonder if there are many kinds of worlds where one can apply the design of Emeralda.
For example, instead of the imaginary place I know as Emeralda, maybe real places like Botswana can be where the game takes place.

My days

I begin these days making sure I have a directory for these ‘Zine essays. I refer to the calendar of my stays on the Islands-of-domains-of-expertise.
This one is RIISMA, the island of research and development on an international scale. It stands for Ritchie’s International Institute for Studies in Multimedia Arts
Surely, it’s here were my engagement with Mavis makes sense, as I am researching and developing my knowledge, skills and attitude toward her, her community, and the African diaspora.
As an American I live in a country guilty of racial prejudice based on ignorance. It’s incumbent on me as a scholar and artist to understand more about Africa in particular.
If I am a world citizen and global thinker-and-doer, I must think how the Emeralda theory I follow as an asset management and legacy transfer system might be have utility value to Mavis.
I may be able to do this by game design. The table in the Mini Art Gallery is covered with game theories in the form of cards, boards, dice, and now a spinner.
Spinner design based on a Botswana basket image

Spinner

We begin with the end in mind – time. Three-hundred sixty days await the Gates Prize winner. For me a paradisiacal region would be populated with poets, artists, musicians and all stripes of creative individuals.
I designed he region around my past experience as an art professor when I learned there were ten characteristics that defined the students who I thought were most successful.
Now I find the context has shifted, that despite I think artists and poets can, as Signora Maria Guaita put it, “Can save the world now,” the calendar may be more than ten islands – it may be eighteen.
The new number is from the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, or SDG. It’s a prioritized list of goals necessary to save Earth’s human and other life sustainability. The body that put this list together four years ago listed 17; but they left out one: Printing access.
Printing is not limited to the centuries-old tradition of mechanical reproduction because printing evolved over the millennia to the Internet. However, access to the media is limited; therefore, I added an 18th sustainable development goal – printmaking access.
Of course, the inspiration for this is my work with printmaking as an art form, but printmaking means more than what some people take it for. It’s not merely an art or craft. Printmaking is a geosocial art form with close ties to performance art.

Vocational school

On January 29th I made a three-minute video titled, “Diamonds and honey,” which is a description of a book to sell for the purpose of financing a vocational college in Botswana. It’s an example of what MIT Business professor Rosabeth Moss-Kanter suggested as an insurance policy for hope, a structure for collaboration.
The book, in other words, despite it’s near fantastic magnitude and great tasks, is a structure for collaboration. My friend in Botswana, Mavis Nduchwa, has dreamed of better education in her country since she was a teenager.
To me, her story (Herstory) exemplifies all African mothers’ dreams.

Monday, January 27, 2020


os200127 In the shadow of the Gates Foundation: 

Recounting educational compromises 

  I clicked on the Easter egg on the lower left corner of my splash page on my personal website, and it was a mild surprise to see what it’s linked to: The Elephant Print pdf file documenting my artist scrip, and artistscripophily concept.
What a good idea!
Lately I’ve been going to bed with the wish – a nightly prayer one might say – to see the movie in my imagination, Emeralda. It’s the story of a mystery ship and a halfwood press.
Another movie I want to see is Swipe – my autobiographical fantasy about a failed art professor with a happy ending and a globe trotting street kid who inherits a halfwood press business.
South of our Mini Art Gallery is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and I work in the shadows of this mega-philanthropical enterprise. Rumored to be the biggest philanthropical organization in the world, this foundation could finance both movies.
However, it’s not their mission. The closest they come to aligning with my goals is in the area of education. One of their former education executives stopped in the gallery one day years ago, and through him I tried to spark interest in my novel approach to STEM.
Previous to his stint at the Gates he was working for the University of Washington education, but his stay there was short. Likewise, his stay at the Gates! He moved to Colorado to be president of a college.
What is it about Seattle? What is it about Washington State that seems to have a problem with education? I was forced out of teaching at the UW. Carl Chew was forced out of public education. Washington State is no place for teachers who answer to a different master.
While I was reviewing my PDF file, Elephant Print, I wondered, “Where did my enthusiasm go?” It still looks good to me – plausible in many respects. Did I “kill my darlings” as one person put it – a teacher of writing?
They meant not to become too attached to one’s creations, that the way to success in the arts is to keep pushing beyond one’s previous achievements. That’s how I interpret the expression.
In other words, trash the artistscripophily idea – don’t become so attached to it that it drags you down. Move on.
Yet, with the prospect of a visit by a woman named Natalia today who has a common interest in Mavis Nduchwa’s venture in Botswana (called Chabana Farms Kalahari Honey), I can’t help but think the idea has a chance.
I’m ever the optimist – like the expression, “Impatient Optimists,” I saw back when I was learning about the Gates Foundation’s education arm. It was Bill Gates, Sr., who was a co-founder of their foundation, who said:
 "I have an optimistic view of human nature. For the most part, I believe people are good, that we want to help our neighbors. I believe people want to be good citizens. When they see a problem, they want to fix it." —William H. Gates, Sr.
A quick look at this one immediately finds the problem: A critic points out their predilection for charter schools and alignment with people like the Walton’s positions and Betsy de Voss’ – most unfortunate conservatives. With friends like that, a liberal can hardly be optimistic about support for Mavis.
After my review and these words, I conclude it is not the failure of the liberal in a search for a better educational outlook, it is the environment.
There’s a story about a cucumber, bright green, shiny-skinned and hard who finds himself in a pickle jar. All the other former cucumbers are dull, gray-green, wrinkled and soft.
“Wow,” said the new cucumber, “What happened to you guys?”
“Stay here long enough and you’ll find out,” they answered.

Sunday, January 19, 2020


ps200119  Upon seeing a big Indian press:  What would E. F. Schumacher say?

 On my Facebook I saw a picture of an etching press – a huge one! I noticed it came from India, in a studio in Chandigarh – perhaps under the direction of Upendar Singh Chahal.

As I looked at it, I couldn’t help but think, “Oh no – this is not right!” Memories of a book came to mind titled, “Small is beautiful” by E. F. Schumacher.
He subtitled it, “Economics as if people mattered.” He meant to comment on the proportional use of technologies, or appropriate technologies. I think his idea was inspired by Mahatma Gandhi. I recall the small spinning devices he advocated which flew in the face of British cotton fabric imports which helped India get independence from the empire.
The new press at Lalit Kala Akademi regional Centre Lucknow
The first thing that struck me was the span of the bed – it appears to be a meter wide, and therefore I assume it’s expected to make prints approaching that scale. It follows then there are facilities to make the plates, and these necessarily are to scale.
Then there are the materials and supplies to consider. If metal is used, then perhaps zinc or, less likely, copper. Sheets of plate glass would be cheaper if they are using vitreography. Paper is next – and I believe there are very good paper mills in India. Nevertheless, large sheets of paper are not cheap.
Consider the quantity of ink, solvents, ventilation for safe handling – all this adds up to an expense that seems out of proportion to me. Of course, on the back end of the process are the buyers of the prints (or monotypes) that come out of making art with this big machine.
Who are the buyers? They must be rich! Here’s where E. F. Schumacher comes in. Is this press a technology appropriate to the people? I picture kids – my favorite people – coming to visit the center. They will say “ooh” and “aaahh” at the specter of this process, but they cannot use it. They probably will never use it although a fraction of their numbers may grow up and in two or three decades, they might be able to buy a print.
A smaller fraction yet will grow up to be an artist or a printer using such a press. However, the bad news is that by that time the press will be junk – discarded because it does not fit the economics of the times – say, 2030, a decade from now.
Already, in America, people are unable to support presses of this scale. Only in group workshops can they do so, and in most instances the plates they print on these presses are only small – plate materials being expensive as well as paper, ink, etcetera.
We make a small, portable, beautiful etching press which appeals to grownups and kids alike. It uses paper that’s so small that kids can even make the paper itself!
What we do conforms to E. F. Schumacher’s suggestion – make etching presses that are appropriately scaled to the economics of today and tomorrow.

Thursday, January 2, 2020


vi200102 

Screenplay game: A concept in the making  

  How to play the screenplay game 

Yesterday I was laying out forty-eight cards for the adaptation of Rembrandt’s Ghost and wondering how I was going to pay for the upgrade if my screenwriting software – Final Draft. At $100 I don’t have the cash.
There’s a print from 2016 I call Peace print, and it’s never been published. I could offer this art as an incentive – print an edition of ten and sell each proof for $50 and a share in the screenplay outcome – the least of which would be a perfect-bound copy like Swipe.

“Shalom,” intaglio and chine-colle.
Later another idea came to mind – make a game out of writing it, with a deck of cards. Arrange it along the lines of Game of Goose, or Chutes and Ladders, as mentioned in the chapter on Van Leest’s story.
How would it work?
First, it would be on the web that people played this game.
Second, they would play as partners – twosomes according to the timing of their signing-up. In the end they would share the print and the share in the screenplay outcome.
There needs to be an incentive for me, too. I need ten good reasons to undertake printing this print. Can I list ten reasons?
1.      The cash for an upgrade of Final Draft.
2.      The fun of printing-on-demand.
3.      The fun of making this into a game.
4.      The prospect of a screen adaptation of the novel.
5.      The setting up of a daily routine, i.e., printing and writing concurrently.
6.      Incentivizing adaptation by making a game out of it.
7.      Putting myself printing in the window of the Mini Art Gallery.
8.      Seeing the print’s publication through – having started in 2016 and not finishing.
9.      The story of the print itself, hope for “Peace” in the Middle east.
10.  The Act of Creation, as Arthur Koestler put it.

Wednesday, January 1, 2020


sp200101 A new year, a new life: The inconvenient truths 

Where there is  life there is hope 

Hope springs eternal. Twenty-twenty is the year now, but it’s also a reference to what amounts to good vision, as in, “I have 20/20 vision.” I can say something philosophical about 20/20 vision of the past, present and – by a stretch of my imagination – the future.
Sadly, it’s not a pretty picture. Since 1992 I have feared what an organization of scientists had said was likely to happen if humankind worldwide did not change it’s ways. I made my own version of 2022 after reading the World’s Scientist’s Warning to Humanity and I called mine “EarthSafe 2022.”
It was in essence a statement about artists’ roles in joining the world’s scientists’ warning and giving a hand in their effort to warn humanity. Artists, after all, play a key role in communicating. An example is when Al Gore tried to warn Americans with his books and slide shows. It was only when artists lent a hand that his message got great notice and won an Academy Award.
But it wasn’t enough. Several other artists in the film industry tried to do something, but as Al Gore said, their message to humankind (and Americans in particularly) was an inconvenience.