180112 On the couch again
Therapist have never seen me, in spite that someone, who I thought
was my friend, suggested that I get help. He was a colleague in the art school
where we had been working together—and playing—for almost twenty years.
He gave me this advice because I was raising a storm about
the way my division in the art school was being run. I thought it was criminal,
in the white-collar sense—how the students were being short-changed. It was my
belief, after years of study and focused on global trends, that the printmaking
division should spearhead a move toward recent technologies. It was 1984.
Printmaking, after all, can be said to be the ancestor of
all technologies so it follows that a university of the size and reputation of ours
(the UW) should take the lead. The pushback was strong, and some of the
administrators resorted to covert methods to stop my campaign.
When I found out about their methods, I became the
equivalent of a whistle-blower. It was at this point when my former friend said
I was emotionally unstable and that I should get a leave of absence and seek
medical help. In his judgement I was nuts, in other words, to think things like
video and computer graphics had a place in the art school going forward.
I never put myself on the couch of a therapist. Like most
crazy people, I suppose, I didn’t think I was crazy. The year before I presented
my contentions (regarding future directions of the printmaking division) I had
gone around the world, at my family’s expense, to gather evidence to support my
thesis. What I had seen and recorded was evidence I was not crazy at all.
Besides, to offer myself to a therapist would have been tantamount
to admitting I was nuts and, having risked my family’s finances, only proved
it. I couldn’t bear that. I would no confess my error and as a result my family’s
assets and my reputation, were ruined and I was forced to resign rather than
apologize for my errors.
Today, as I read a business proposal plan offered to me by a
recent buyer of one of my designs—a WeeWoodie Rembrandt Press—I experienced the
same feeling of panic when I came to the part about hard facts of costs. The
question, “Am I nuts?” reared its fearsome head. It was not a feeling that I
was wrong to think printmaking is the ancestor of all technologies and
therefore should be integrated into a printmaking teaching method.
It was ta feeling set off when, in reading the business plan
template, I came to the requirement that I write down the financial structuring
needed: How much will it cost? The budget must be known if I am to proceed.
Otherwise I’m wasting mine and everyone else’ time.
I as a mollycoddled art professor who never had to write any
more of a budget than an annual forecast of how much kerosene we might need in
the etching studio, or what a new press might cost.
I’ve met this monster before and its name is financial
ignorance. How would I know how much a printmaking teaching method designed for
the cloud will cost?
If I am a subject matter expert, not a financial expert, am
I supposed to know the answer? A printmaking SME is supposed to know how many
drops of nitric acid one should put in how much gum Arabic when processing a
medium-gray lithograph stone—and what considerations, besides the color of the
stone, must be taken.
A printmaking SME also knows a bit of history and, above
all, the place of printmaking in the world as it is today. He or she should
know how printmaking fits in to education of young people above all others.
As a SME who gave a generation of his life to college-level printmaking
education should also be equipped to adapt to the age of digital reproduction
not only for colleges but also for the population globally. It might be argued
that printmaking is the equivalent of buggy-whip manufacturing.
Why bother? Old-world printmaking is dead considering digital
printmaking is easier, cheaper, faster, etc., is it not? Tell that to my 250
customers who shelled out thousands of dollars for the etching presses I
designed and that my collaborator, Tom, built.
Tell that to the guy—a certified blockchain technology
consultant—who provided me with boilerplate text to build my business plan on.
I deeply long for the ability to say what is the budget, but
in the financial planning world I do not trust my ability to forecast what it
should be. For example, as a SME, what salary or fee should apply to me? What
should I pay the man who filled in the parts of the business plan as a gift, as—dare
I say—a collaborator? He has not asked for anything, but I estimate, in his field,
what he has already given me is of the value of at least $500 for two hours’ of
work.
He has paid only $140 to me, which cost me about half to
fulfill his order of a press.
No comments:
Post a Comment